Nathan was also nice to her (well, by his standards) and found her attractive.
Also: well, in truth it would be Bruno's "natural instinct" to have rough sex with or even rape a female. That's what animals generally do. Is misogyny on a show still problematic if it's presented, loud and clear, as misogyny? 'Cause for my part, I'm usually only bothered by a scene when there's dissonance between my perception of it and the writer's. Not the case with Bruno/Kelly.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
momijizukamori
Re: Part 2
Date: 2010-12-16 03:29 am (UTC)Also: well, in truth it would be Bruno's "natural instinct" to have rough sex with or even rape a female. That's what animals generally do. Is misogyny on a show still problematic if it's presented, loud and clear, as misogyny? 'Cause for my part, I'm usually only bothered by a scene when there's dissonance between my perception of it and the writer's. Not the case with Bruno/Kelly.
ITA with your "Part 1", though.