Nathan was also nice to her (well, by his standards) and found her attractive.

Also: well, in truth it would be Bruno's "natural instinct" to have rough sex with or even rape a female. That's what animals generally do. Is misogyny on a show still problematic if it's presented, loud and clear, as misogyny? 'Cause for my part, I'm usually only bothered by a scene when there's dissonance between my perception of it and the writer's. Not the case with Bruno/Kelly.

ITA with your "Part 1", though.